PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130510 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 17 '22 at 18:18 |
Run Duration | 289 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
76.2%
Very good
|
75% 124 Pts
|
53% 413 Pts
|
33% 497 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3212) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.4%
Below average
|
35% 46.4 fps
|
35% 33.4 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 105 86 86 83 86 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
29% 132 MB/s
|
43% 13.7 MB/s
|
58% 111 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$205
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 293 291 290 293 300 MB/s
|
89%
Excellent
|
70% 313 MB/s
|
132% 41.9 MB/s
|
344% 408 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
283GB free
Firmware: 0406
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 15 15 15 16 MB/s
|
12.9%
Very poor
|
17% 22.9 MB/s
|
183% 2.13 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 16 16 16 17 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
17% 23.3 MB/s
|
202% 1.77 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
49%
Average
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
62% 64.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24% | 7% | 108 | 320 | 243 | 60 | 24" | 1920 1080 | DEL404B DELL G2410 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-3770KIntel $275Bench 77%, 153,413 samples | 2,883x |
Core i5-3570KIntel $246Bench 76%, 200,366 samples | 1,092x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 74%, 288,184 samples | 758x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $125Bench 50%, 823,201 samples | 413x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $138Bench 80%, 1,295,591 samples | 374x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,449,936 samples | 359x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $750 |