HP h8-1409

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	HP h8-1409 (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	2.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120925
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '22 at 14:48
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 97 2-Core 174 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 414 45% 358 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 1366) CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 522.25 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44% Average	Lighting 52.5 Reflection 67 Parallax 57.9 43% 59.1 fps	MRender 64.3 Gravity 55.7 Splatting 52.5 46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB 30,264 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 249GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0817B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 204 21 65 42 80 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 248 Write 219 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 96.7 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 1 35% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 18.1 DQ Mixed 1.1 21% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 102%
WDC WD50 00LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 326GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 45 37 55 57 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 127 Write 38.2 Mixed 46.1 SusWrite 49.2 75% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 44% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 10GB 185 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	46.7% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 14.3 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1409 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: HP h8-1409

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x
Radeon HD 7570AMDBench 5%, 12,360 samples	2x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	3x
MX200 500GBCrucial $90Bench 83%, 17,487 samples	1x
AMD Radeon R7 480GBOCZ $195Bench 90%, 707 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 10GBMicronBench 42%, 117 samples	3x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 55%, 18,444 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 5,347 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $496

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16