Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 192%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 10:44
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 271
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 914
87% 719 Pts
64-Core 1,426
88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
206% Outstanding
Lighting 305
Reflection 296
Parallax 311
249% 304 fps
MRender 331
Gravity 243
Splatting 181
198% 252 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 206%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2311 2326 2363 1798 2289 1448 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 1,996
Write 2,357
Mixed 2,101
SusWrite 2,089
483% 2,136 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 79
252% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 946
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 858
634% 840 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 323%
Great: 614%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
258GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 419 416 408 411 417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 333
Write 400
Mixed 354
SusWrite 419
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 29.8
116% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 280
229% 327 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90%
Great: 123%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
484GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 425 425 422 422 423 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 418
Mixed 333
SusWrite 424
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 37
128% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 267
223% 322 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 123%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
431GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 83 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 112
Write 97.5
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 82
58% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 75%
SanDisk SDDR-113 16GB
15GB free, PID a7c1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 13 12 13 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 56.8
Write 10.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 12
22% 22 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
93% 8.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 29.6
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 27.9
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback