Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory31.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 25 '22 at 01:36
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 276
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 764
78% 633 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 203
Parallax 195
172% 203 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 148
Splatting 126
122% 154 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 144%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 269 264 239 243 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 274
Write 365
Mixed 243
SusWrite 254
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 33.4
116% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 162
134% 192 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
704GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 24 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 64.3
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 25.1
31% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.5
153% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 90%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 11 11 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 13 14 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$201
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 32 29 30 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32% Below average
Read 79.5
Write 63
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 31.6
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 32%
Great: 97%
WD WD120EDAZ-11F3RA0 12TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 31 27 26 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 119
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 28
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
197% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 26.5TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 4.1 4.7 6.3 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 100
Write 1
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 7
21% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Mixed 0
31% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 2OZ DDR4 3600 DDR4 3600 2OZ DDR4 3600 48GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 29
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.3
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback