Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '22 at 16:58
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 145
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 373
37% 303 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 380X
Sapphire(174B E308) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.7% Below average
Lighting 48.5
Reflection 47.1
Parallax 59.6
40% 51.7 fps
MRender 47.4
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 32.8
34% 43.1 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$99
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 454 419 435 436 438 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,084
Write 950
Mixed 923
SusWrite 437
190% 848 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 55.2
182% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 478
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 415
305% 404 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 145%
Great: 237%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
107GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 289 294 318 317 319 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 197
Write 261
Mixed 364
SusWrite 297
64% 280 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 33.8
124% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 118
112% 172 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
100GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 95 95 97 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 109
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 95.2
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 77%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
43GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 92 93 94 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 80.5
Write 87.9
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 92.5
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 71%
WD WD7500AARX-00N0YB0 750GB
607GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 83 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 83.8
Write 79.4
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 82.2
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
285GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 117 118 120 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 109
Write 115
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 118
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/ KHX2133C11D3/ 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 20.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 13.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback