Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 21:10
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 150
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 435
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 380X
Sapphire(174B E308) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.6% Below average
Lighting 46.7
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 60.4
38% 59.1 fps
MRender 47.1
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 32.3
34% 42.7 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$99
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 193 193 190 184 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 541
Write 463
Mixed 485
SusWrite 189
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 54.8
179% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 425
319% 428 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 108%
Great: 237%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
102GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 100 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 414
Write 429
Mixed 339
SusWrite 99
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 33.8
123% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 150
130% 190 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
100GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 81 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 85.7
Write 108
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 83.1
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 77%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
43GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 92 93 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 91.5
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 92.1
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 71%
WD WD7500AARX-00N0YB0 750GB
607GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 84.6
Write 84.1
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 82.6
64% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
285GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 95 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 120
Write 102
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 95.6
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
162% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/ KHX2133C11D3/ 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.8
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback