Alienware Aurora-R3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 046MHW
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110525
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '22 at 18:32
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 160
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 398
40% 325 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.2% Average
Lighting 60.2
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 70.2
49% 67 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 61.4
Splatting 56.3
50% 61.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 34 28 43 28 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 53
Write 233
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 48.1
21% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 22.7
80% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 74.8
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 18.6
21% 36.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 85%
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
28GB free
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 128 131 135 135 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 231
Write 132
Mixed 140
SusWrite 131
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 20.1
70% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 67.5
DQ Mixed 64
58% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 48%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
55GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 75 78 77 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 71.2
Write 76.4
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 76.5
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
43GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 100 104 102 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 73.6
Write 81.2
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 102
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$68
246GB free
Firmware: PB4ZC61H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 38 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 55.8
Write 54
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 39.3
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0 M378B5773DH0 M378B5273DH0 M378B5773DH0 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R3 Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Alienware Aurora-R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback