TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus EX-H110M-V3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus EX-H110M-V3  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '22 at 21:39
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 191
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 514
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 73.9%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 111
Parallax 126
98% 119 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 109
Splatting 103
104% 132 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 99.8%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-120 120GB
28GB free
Firmware: ZD0R024N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 378 340 67 38 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 414
Write 371
Mixed 318
SusWrite 204
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 30.7
104% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 163
136% 191 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 70.5%
 Great: 89%
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 157 74 73 77 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 405
Write 286
Mixed 337
SusWrite 134
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 29.8
123% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 189
164% 241 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 73.5%
 Great: 90%
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
139GB free
Firmware: GT001L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 52.9
Write 67.4
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 72.9
38% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 36.1%
 Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KS3200D4P13516G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.5% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 20.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 72.5%
 Great: 111%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical EX-H110M-V3 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus EX-H110M-V3

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples5x
Core i3-7100Intel  $38Bench 57%, 79,299 samples5x
Core i7-6700Intel  $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples4x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples7x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia  $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples3x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples2x
SSD
330 Series 120GBIntel  $188Bench 68%, 11,188 samples3x
S3 250G 250GBSandiskBench 87%, 1,221 samples2x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples2x
RAM
9905678-014.A00G 2x4GBKingstonBench 74%, 1,428 samples2x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples2x
KS3200D4P13516G 2x16GBUnknownBench 89%, 15 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback