Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 14:54
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 286
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 1073
95% 805 Pts
64-Core 2,873
178% 2,873 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Lighting 246
Reflection 219
Parallax 212
200% 226 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 163
Splatting 132
144% 184 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 165%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 368
Write 448
Mixed 276
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 39.1
141% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 2TB
384GB free
Firmware: STNSC014
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,057
Write 2,724
Mixed 2,166
520% 2,316 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 78.2
264% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 945
DQ Write 881
DQ Mixed 922
690% 916 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 472%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
804GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 379
Write 374
Mixed 321
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 35.7
122% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
External USB3.0 DISK00 10TB
91GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 198
Write 194
Mixed 171
240% 188 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.7
306% 8.7 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 94%
External USB3.0 DISK04 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 230
Write 238
Mixed 120
242% 196 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.5
256% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK02 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 243
Write 235
Mixed 122
245% 200 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
255% 6 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 89%
External USB3.0 DISK01 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 242
Write 240
Mixed 122
247% 201 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
256% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 78%
External USB3.0 DISK00 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 240
Write 226
Mixed 121
239% 196 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.5
242% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 89%
External USB3.0 DISK03 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 175
Write 178
Mixed 121
199% 158 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 92%
External USB3.0 DISK01 10TB
91GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 148
Write 146
Mixed 98.2
163% 130 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.2
194% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 85%
External USB3.0 DISK02 10TB
91GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 235
Write 218
Mixed 118
232% 190 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.3
248% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 40.2
119% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 37.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,616
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback