Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 14:44
Run Duration457 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 1,060
96% 806 Pts
64-Core 2,864
177% 2,864 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB; ROG-STRIX-RTX3070TI-O8G-GAMING, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.25
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 246
Reflection 218
Parallax 232
200% 232 fps
Gravity 163
Splatting 132
128% 147 fps
Poor: 139% Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 425 417 323 171 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 448
Mixed 351
SusWrite 320
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 51.6
175% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 197
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 2TB
384GB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3454 954 903 751 767 261 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,072
Write 2,760
Mixed 2,154
SusWrite 1,182
461% 2,042 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 81.8
284% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 898
DQ Mixed 943
708% 944 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 285%
Great: 472%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
804GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 426 433 447 444 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 448
Mixed 434
SusWrite 437
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 40.9
144% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 133%
External USB3.0 DISK00 10TB
91GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 106 105 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.5% Very good
Read 233
Write 213
Mixed 187
SusWrite 104
242% 184 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
306% 8.7 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 94%
External USB3.0 DISK04 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 2 1.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 213
Write 228
Mixed 121
SusWrite 0.9
176% 141 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.3
251% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK02 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 2 1.6 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 234
Write 236
Mixed 121
SusWrite 0.9
182% 148 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.3
251% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 89%
External USB3.0 DISK01 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.9 1.6 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 248
Write 239
Mixed 132
SusWrite 0.9
190% 155 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.2
264% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55%
Great: 78%
External USB3.0 DISK00 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 106 106 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 242
Write 227
Mixed 118
SusWrite 105
221% 173 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 89%
External USB3.0 DISK03 10TB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 106 106 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 207
Write 211
Mixed 114
SusWrite 105
207% 159 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 92%
External USB3.0 DISK01 10TB
91GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 104 106 105 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.8% Above average
Read 158
Write 158
Mixed 103
SusWrite 104
173% 131 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
184% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 85%
External USB3.0 DISK02 10TB
91GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 115 115 115 114 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.5% Very good
Read 232
Write 224
Mixed 123
SusWrite 115
224% 174 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
254% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 39.9
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 37.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,646
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback