Asus F1A55-M LX3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LX3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120531
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 01:44
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 90
46% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 160
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1557) 1GB
CLim: 981 MHz, MLim: 1128 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.54
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.48% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 9.2
9% 11.9 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 11.5
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 74 73 32 102 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 197
Write 186
Mixed 10
SusWrite 69.1
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 12.6
45% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 26%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
710GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 73 33 102 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 150
Write 134
Mixed 76
SusWrite 71.7
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
746GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 86 87 93 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 115
Write 104
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 88.1
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 86 87 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 156
Write 157
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 88.2
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LX3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback