Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RF510/RF410/RF710  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RF510/RF410/RF710
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '22 at 14:04
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 101
52% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 201
21% 167 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sanyo(144D C08E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.25% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.3
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.4
2% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.25%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 8.5 6.6 145 159 168 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.2% Poor
Read 127
Write 89.7
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 99.6
22% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 7.8
31% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 17.2
DQ Mixed 14
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Tuodamu/ddr3/8g 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.9% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.5
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RF510/RF410/RF710 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback