Alienware Aurora R7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R7  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0VDT73
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '22 at 11:21
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 832
82% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,082
67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 241
Reflection 218
Parallax 211
196% 223 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 164
Splatting 133
144% 184 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 163%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 333 311 297 324 312 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 702
Write 206
Mixed 382
SusWrite 330
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 31.7
118% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 574
376% 440 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 101%
Great: 193%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
377GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 506 241 774 507 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Seagate Fast SSD 250GB
101GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 287 284 286 283 286 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 310
Write 281
Mixed 263
SusWrite 280
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 23
71% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 118
92% 126 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 191 194 192 192 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 148
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 191
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Terra Master DAS 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 202 205 212 204 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 169
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 206
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1
262% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Terra Master DAS 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 129 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 138
Write 125
Mixed 93.9
SusWrite 127
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 76%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XRMWRN-HYA 313698041100 XRMWRN-HYA 32GB
2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 29.7
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 29.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R7 Builds (Compare 5,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Alienware Aurora R7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $431
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback