Alienware Aurora R7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R7  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0VDT73
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220119
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 05 '22 at 11:56
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 263
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 871
83% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 241
Reflection 220
Parallax 210
196% 224 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 164
Splatting 133
145% 184 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 163%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 311 324 306 331 318 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,830
Write 471
Mixed 408
SusWrite 315
164% 756 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 46.6
176% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 287
233% 331 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 162%
Great: 193%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
276GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,862
Write 7,308
Mixed 7,798
1,780% 7,989 MB/s
4K Read 754
4K Write 256
4K Mixed 350
1,727% 454 MB/s
DQ Read 1,499
DQ Write 810
DQ Mixed 939
756% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Seagate Fast SSD 250GB
99GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 283 284 284 286 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 347
Write 312
Mixed 292
SusWrite 280
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 26.1
87% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 86.9
76% 114 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 194 194 192 194 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 131
Mixed 81
SusWrite 193
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Terra Master DAS 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 206 205 204 206 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 231
Write 200
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 203
132% 181 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.1
271% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 125%
Great: 124%
Terra Master DAS 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 140 142 143 143 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 124
Write 91.6
Mixed 106
SusWrite 140
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XRMWRN-HYA 313698041100 XRMWRN-HYA 32GB
2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 30.2
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 29.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R7 Builds (Compare 5,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Alienware Aurora R7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $431
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback