Alienware Aurora R7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R7  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0VDT73
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '22 at 06:47
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 138
2-Core 254
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 808
76% 633 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Nvidia(10DE 14B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 250
Parallax 183
165% 212 fps
MRender 254
Gravity 164
Splatting 133
144% 184 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 147%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 325 284 319 243 242 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 694
Write 304
Mixed 356
SusWrite 294
91% 412 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 46
160% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 284
231% 327 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 111%
Great: 193%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
276GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,948
Write 6,755
Mixed 7,463
1,717% 7,722 MB/s
4K Read 718
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 323
1,623% 423 MB/s
DQ Read 1,477
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 866
710% 1,032 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Seagate Fast SSD 250GB
99GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 280 283 286 285 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 344
Write 308
Mixed 290
SusWrite 280
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 26
87% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 81.9
71% 105 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 193 196 195 195 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 148
Mixed 83
SusWrite 194
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Terra Master DAS 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 208 210 212 212 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 232
Write 209
Mixed 91.9
SusWrite 208
135% 185 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.1
268% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 126%
Great: 124%
Terra Master DAS 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 129 130 130 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 132
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 127
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XRMWRN-HYA 313698041100 XRMWRN-HYA 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 24.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 27.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R7 Builds (Compare 5,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Alienware Aurora R7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $431
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback