Shuttle XH310

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemShuttle XH310  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FH310V
Memory2.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180622
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '22 at 09:33
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 193
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 625
57% 476 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 68%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Device(1297 4063) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.7
4% 5.87 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 118 113 108 104 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 307
Write 130
Mixed 179
SusWrite 120
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 29.9
95% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 161
138% 210 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 128%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
161GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 73 76 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 80.7
Write 50.3
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 73.7
43% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 859B CT4G4SFS824A.C8FF 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XH310 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Shuttle XH310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback