Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 07 '22 at 04:48
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 1,009
90% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,524
94% 1,524 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 96%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 210
Parallax 251
172% 224 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 206
Splatting 175
172% 216 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 158%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 786 637 580 559 554 548 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,411
Write 2,245
Mixed 1,755
SusWrite 610
392% 1,756 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 85.6
286% 99.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1161
DQ Write 858
DQ Mixed 994
747% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 268%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
172GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2208 789 764 761 760 761 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2,520
Write 2,142
Mixed 1,702
SusWrite 1,007
412% 1,843 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 87.5
292% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,252
DQ Write 961
DQ Mixed 1,078
814% 1,097 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 302%
Great: 340%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
278GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 153 153 153 153 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 122
Write 132
Mixed 88
SusWrite 153
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
329GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 162 160 161 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 147
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 161
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 96%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
558GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 163 166 163 164 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 101%
WD WD102KRYZ-01A5AB0 10TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 240 241 233 243 244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 239
Mixed 116
SusWrite 240
150% 205 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 1.7
392% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 134%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 30.7
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 30.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback