HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89D2
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '22 at 00:34
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 50.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 242
74% 141 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 542
58% 464 Pts
64-Core 623
39% 623 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 89D2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.22.01
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 18.7
10% 15 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 17.8
13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 522 483 578 774 770 767 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,005
Write 845
Mixed 831
SusWrite 649
187% 832 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 48.5
155% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 598
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 541
367% 456 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 147%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 22
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 17.6
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback