HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89D2
Memory3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '22 at 22:45
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 51
1-Core 129
2-Core 258
76% 146 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 700
75% 599 Pts
64-Core 769
48% 769 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 89D2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.22.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 10
Parallax 19.3
13% 15.1 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 18.8
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 586 577 557 572 480 488 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 988
Write 835
Mixed 822
SusWrite 543
179% 797 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 50.9
170% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 724
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 599
418% 534 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 148%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.1% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 22
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 17.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback