Acer Aspire V7-482P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire V7-482P  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Polaris_HW
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '22 at 06:59
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 71%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 84.5
44% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 117
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 079C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.51% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 5.4
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.51%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 298 375 335 336 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 390
Write 399
Mixed 370
SusWrite 333
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 35.7
115% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 213
164% 227 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR6A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.3% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V7-482P Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V7-482P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback