PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Lenovo 90B6005YMT (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO 367D |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161027 |
Uptime | 2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 29 '22 at 19:13 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
67.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$50
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 204 207 216 217 215 MB/s
|
81.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 870 EVO 500G 500GB
53GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 30 29 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $494 |