Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 19:00
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 301
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,112
100% 844 Pts
64-Core 2,136
132% 2,136 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 207
Parallax 200
182% 210 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 152
Splatting 135
129% 161 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,395
Write 9,869
Mixed 10,145
2,265% 10,136 MB/s
4K Read 480
4K Write 364
4K Mixed 402
1,435% 415 MB/s
DQ Read 1374
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 1,242
930% 1,242 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
85GB free
Firmware: S5Z42102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10463
Write 9,815
Mixed 10,266
2,275% 10,181 MB/s
4K Read 514
4K Write 401
4K Mixed 436
1,550% 450 MB/s
DQ Read 1,516
DQ Write 1,225
DQ Mixed 1,361
1,022% 1,368 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 277%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
510GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,575
Write 9,877
Mixed 10,282
7,726% 10,245 MB/s
4K Read 542
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 379
68,116% 368 MB/s
DQ Read 1,526
DQ Write 1,245
DQ Mixed 1,368
12,600% 1,380 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
589GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,564
Write 10,276
Mixed 10,325
7,830% 10,388 MB/s
4K Read 538
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 445
75,213% 388 MB/s
DQ Read 1,538
DQ Write 1,234
DQ Mixed 1,301
12,186% 1,358 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
313GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 135 129 112 119 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Elements SE 2622 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2622
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,730
Write 10,110
Mixed 10,277
11,542% 7,706 MB/s
4K Read 536
4K Write 401
4K Mixed 207
22,676% 381 MB/s
DQ Read 1,259
DQ Write 1,170
DQ Mixed 1,311
89,087% 1247 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 37.3
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 34.9
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $645
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback