MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateSep 21 '22 at 11:28
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 171
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 288
37% 282 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 95.3
Reflection 104
Parallax 95.5
78% 98.2 fps
MRender 91.9
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 94.7
77% 94.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
251GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 389 450 435 465 441 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 468
Mixed 455
SusWrite 421
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 27.1
111% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 360
251% 317 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 260 258 257 259 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,209
Write 1,046
Mixed 1,041
SusWrite 273
199% 892 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 59.8
170% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 464
373% 537 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 145%
Great: 280%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
142GB free
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 149 76 78 80 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.2% Below average
Read 251
Write 102
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 137
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 10.8
43% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 15.1
12% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
278GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 205 196 322 194 317 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 87.5
Write 87.5
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 251
29% 126 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 6.5
26% 9.93 MB/s
DQ Read 8.7
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 10.6
8% 11.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 29.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $683
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback