MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C80
MotherboardMSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK  (all builds)
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '22 at 05:12
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$129
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 281
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 589
74% 562 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.4% Very good
Lighting 96.2
Reflection 109
Parallax 98.1
78% 101 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 95.1
Splatting 96.6
78% 95.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,499
Write 1,874
Mixed 1,379
355% 1,584 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 65.8
226% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,097
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 914
680% 910 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
429GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 432
Mixed 369
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 57.1
179% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
269% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
G-drive USB 6TB
863GB free
Firmware: 2602
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 157
Mixed 112
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.8
398% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 128%
G-drive USB 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 2602
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 160
Write 153
Mixed 30.8
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 132%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 208
Write 199
Mixed 96.6
124% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.8
373% 3 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 138%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.4
Write 113
Mixed 95
75% 100 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
432% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 139
Write 96
Mixed 72.3
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 98.9
Mixed 88.6
123% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 105%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 108
Mixed 76.2
129% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 60%
WD Game Drive 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 2631
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 259
Write 33.4
Mixed 114
136% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.4
306% 3.5 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 0.9
348% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 34.8
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 51
SC Mixed 31.5
100% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C80) Builds (Compare 8,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK - $253

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback