Asrock B360M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B360M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 17 '22 at 17:47
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 932
77% 670 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Asus(1043 886E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 283
Reflection 254
Parallax 317
231% 284 fps
MRender 338
Gravity 231
Splatting 172
193% 247 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 195%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 311 282 265 254 248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 465
Write 321
Mixed 259
SusWrite 278
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 31.9
116% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 249
212% 310 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 130%
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
74GB free
Firmware: 5.2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 190 211 220 218 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 398
Write 246
Mixed 242
SusWrite 212
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 30.5
113% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 223
172% 234 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 90%
Hgst HUS726T6TALE6L4 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: VKGNW460
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 232 238 239 230 238 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 219
Write 225
Mixed 106
SusWrite 236
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.7
7% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 28%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
242GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1172 873 609 107 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,802
Write 1,644
Mixed 146
SusWrite 480
225% 1,018 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 61
196% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 616
575% 898 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 209%
Great: 370%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
753GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 46 85 86 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 76.1
Write 35
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 62.6
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
26% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M-HDV Builds (Compare 865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B360M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback