PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B360M-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181023 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Sep 17 '22 at 17:47 |
Run Duration | 220 Seconds |
Run User | HKG-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
|
76.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Asus(1043 886E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
195%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 311 282 265 254 248 MB/s
|
86.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
74GB free
Firmware: 5.2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 190 211 220 218 210 MB/s
|
74.2%
Very good
|
|||
Hgst HUS726T6TALE6L4 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: VKGNW460
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 232 238 239 230 238 MB/s
|
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
242GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1172 873 609 107 61 61 MB/s
|
209%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
753GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 46 85 86 87 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
75.3%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 197x |
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 193x |
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 135x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 96x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 81x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 74x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $485 |