Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X531FLC_S531FL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X531FLC_S531FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X531FLC
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 10:49
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 239
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 562
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 164F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 7.9
5% 10.3 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1309
Write 744
Mixed 27.9
150% 693 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 18.6
110% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 29.2
57% 125 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 200%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
288GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 103 103 102 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 51.9
Write 82
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 100
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 24.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 26.5
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X531FLC_S531FL Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X531FLC_S531FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback