Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 630 7,197 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	45% Average	Memory 61.3 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 85.9 40% 63.2 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 165 22% 167 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 809F) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.91% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 0.3 2% 1.57 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.6 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.91% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS541060G9SA00 60GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: MB3OC60R SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 11 18 12 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 27.1 Write 28.8 Mixed 17.1 SusWrite 13.8 16% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 19%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB 3,373 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 38GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 154 Write 17.6 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 17.1 52% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 4.4 275% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-096.A 4x2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.5% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 12.8 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.3 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	43x
BLS4G3D1609DS 2x4GBCrucialBench 43%, 4,102 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	20x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $549

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16