Medion MS-7797

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Medion MS-7797 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MS-7797
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '22 at 21:32
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	46.3% Average	Memory 51.7 1-Core 93.3 2-Core 169 58% 105 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 380 36% 300 Pts	64-Core 415 26% 415 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.1% Above average	Lighting 69.6 Reflection 71.6 Parallax 65.3 57% 68.8 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 69.7 Splatting 66.5 55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 22 21 20 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 79% Great: 133%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 239GB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 92 92 81 66 82 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 73.3 Write 92.8 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 82.6 62% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.1 69% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 0, 0 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	47.1% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.9 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.8 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7797 Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7797

CPU
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	157x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	137x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	60x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	149x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GBNanyaBench 54%, 1,719 samples	65x
M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 2x2GBNanyaBench 48%, 472 samples	33x
M378B5773EB0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 52%, 217 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16