Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150429
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 08 '19 at 16:49
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 121
53% 87 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 193
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
PNY(196E 139F) 2GB
CLim: 1563 MHz, MLim: 1704 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 36
Parallax 32.6
29% 34.7 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 34.5
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VectoTech 128GB
82GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 218 209 205 216 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 303
Write 231
Mixed 249
SusWrite 213
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 26.2
89% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 79.1
61% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
848GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 163 133 142 141 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 169
Mixed 39
SusWrite 145
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB
1866, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.2% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback