Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme6/3.1  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 16:12
Run Duration422 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 175
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 633
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 867
54% 867 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 148
Parallax 136
111% 140 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 141
Splatting 124
105% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 464
Write 340
Mixed 333
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 39.1
135% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 334
254% 344 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
28GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 201 135 127 141 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 365
Write 270
Mixed 279
SusWrite 155
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 29.1
126% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 220
170% 232 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
12GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 83 81 94 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 109
Write 100
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 86.2
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 97%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
107GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 2.1 3.3 1.8 4.3 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 1
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.5
1% 1.67 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 76%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
0GB free
Firmware: 0004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.7
Write 36.9
Mixed 34.6
27% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 69%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
323GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 91 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
51% Above average
Read 87.6
Write 99
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 89.9
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$134
85GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 91 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 71.9
Write 20.4
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 89.9
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 66%
Generic- SD/MMC 128GB
91GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 17.9
Write 17.4
Mixed 17
SusWrite 17.5
24% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.6
236% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 17%
Toshiba External USB HDD 500GB
10GB free, PID a003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.9 8.8 8.9 9 8.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 31.6
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 8.8
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.2 8.9 9 9.1 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 36.4
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 9.1
35% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 51%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
101GB free, PID 2120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9 8.9 8.9 9 9.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.55% Terrible
Read 36.7
Write 37
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 9.1
34% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.55%
Great: 18%
Seagate FreeAgent Pro 750GB
24GB free, PID 3110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9 9 9.1 9.1 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.2% Terrible
Read 33.8
Write 3.5
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 9.1
15% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GRR F4-2400C15-8GRR F4-2133C15-8GRR F4-2133C15-8GRR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme6/3.1 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $330
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback