Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160324
Uptime	20.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '21 at 23:50
Run Duration	317 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 218 69% 125 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 667 67% 543 Pts	64-Core 829 51% 829 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 148 Parallax 136 112% 141 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 142 Splatting 123 104% 128 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 454 Write 345 Mixed 306 82% 369 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 32.3 125% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 340 259% 350 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80 4,893 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 165GB free Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 221 221 224 223 221 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 391 Write 289 Mixed 279 SusWrite 214 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 31.1 121% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 299 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 250 196% 271 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 91%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 661GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 99 100 106 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 93.8 Mixed 70.9 SusWrite 102 68% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 97%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 145GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.5 4.9 7.1 4.2 4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Read 1.2 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 4.7 1% 1.77 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 76%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 5,996 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 32.8 Write 32.5 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 40.4 25% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.5 149% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 69%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 323GB free Firmware: 0105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 58 59 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 86.1 Write 99.4 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 58.3 55% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 74%
Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$134 2,758 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 85GB free Firmware: 0105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 58 59 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 70.5 Write 24.7 Mixed 41.2 SusWrite 58 36% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 66%
ST332062 0A 320GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 24GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 34 34 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 36.9 Write 15.2 Mixed 25 SusWrite 33.4 36% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GRR F4-2400C15-8GRR F4-2133C15-8GRR F4-2133C15-8GRR 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.2% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 21.6 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 17.6 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme6/3.1 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	23x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	8x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	4x

SSD
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	5x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $122Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	4x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	3x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 99U5702-094.A00G 16GBUnknownBench 65%, 7 samples	6x
9965600-012.A01G 9965600-005.A01G 9965600-005.A01G 9965600-005.A01G 64GBUnknownBench 104%, 5 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILL $182Bench 76%, 7,414 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $330

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16