Lenovo 43538H8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 43538H8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 07:53
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 65
2-Core 129
49% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 474
43% 361 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 10.6
7% 9.77 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 9.6
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB300G4L 300GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LD10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 207 175 170 165 159 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52% Above average
Read 211
Write 226
Mixed 189
SusWrite 185
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 22.8
78% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 189
140% 185 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 52%
Great: 91%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
661GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 195 194 194 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 130
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 194
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.6
309% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 36KSF1G72PZ-1 Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 36KSF1G72PZ-1 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.1% Very good
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 29.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.3
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 43538H8 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 43538H8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback