Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 16:23
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 296
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,169
102% 870 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3161) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 62.9
52% 65.8 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 64
Splatting 55.1
50% 62 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb QLC SATA SSD 512GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0220A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 13 135 12 99 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 403
Write 366
Mixed 31
SusWrite 72.7
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 0.3
77% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 0.3
62% 143 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 96%
Maxtor OneTouch 123GB
18GB free, PID 7010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 37 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 14.2
Write 36.6
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 36
40% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 19%
Maxtor OneTouch 120GB
104GB free, PID 7010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.3% Very poor
Read 18.9
Write 37.8
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 37
42% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 24.7
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 26.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback