TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 90RC00CJMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90RC00CJMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3716
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210324
Uptime4 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 16:29
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$305
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 239
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 847
80% 662 Pts
64-Core 1,193
74% 1,193 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑
This bench: 91.9%
 Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3906) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 163
Parallax 154
132% 160 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 150
Splatting 141
123% 151 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 123%
 Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1207 604 550 527 522 476 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,000
Write 2,335
Mixed 1,845
SusWrite 648
384% 1,707 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 73.9
256% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 937
703% 940 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑
This bench: 241%
 Great: 332%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 LENOVO 2TB
894GB free
Firmware: MX4OAD10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 168 173 173 172 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 173
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 172
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 99.4%
 Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K M378A1G44AB0-CWE 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 32GB
3200, 2133, 3200, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 36
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 28.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 27.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 76.6%
 Great: 77%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 90RC00CJMW Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90RC00CJMW

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples44x
Ryzen 3 3100AMDBench 75%, 50,446 samples3x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples1x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples40x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples3x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples2x
SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TBSamsungBench 289%, 9,415 samples29x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TBWDCBench 250%, 4,445 samples13x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples2x
RAM
M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 71%, 9,655 samples20x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 84%, 6,189 samples19x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback