Acer TC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemAcer TC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171206
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 12:12
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$84
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 88
2-Core 181
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 254
38% 274 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 69.3
60% 72.2 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 57.7
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 299 303 297 304 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 354
Write 301
Mixed 256
SusWrite 295
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 25.5
96% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 223
188% 274 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
721GB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 148 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 149
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 148
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 108%
Toshiba THNSNK256GVN8 M.2 2280 256GB
132GB free
Firmware: K8DC4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 251 255 253 259 258 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD48G266681 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TC-780 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback