Https://www.chn-ipc.com/ CML02

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHttps://www.chn-ipc.com/ CML02  (all builds)
Motherboardhttps://www.chn-ipc.com/ CML02
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 05:12
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 251
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 588
66% 516 Pts
64-Core 720
44% 720 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 6.9
5% 7.23 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S500 1TB
914GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H210928a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 436 440 441 440 437 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 476
Mixed 444
SusWrite 442
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 51.1
192% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 303
221% 285 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFS832A.C8FE 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 12.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CML02 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Https://www.chn-ipc.com/ CML02

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback