Asrock B560 Steel Legend

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B560 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211022
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '22 at 21:34
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$235
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 274
96% 171 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 956
89% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,501
93% 1,501 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 100%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1289 1286 1248 1277 1196 1219 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 1,194
Mixed 1,174
SusWrite 1,252
282% 1,250 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 81.2
264% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 1,331
DQ Write 1,029
DQ Mixed 1,161
874% 1,174 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 266%
Great: 410%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
163GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 211 201 202 203 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 431
Write 374
Mixed 355
SusWrite 216
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 38.1
133% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 207
182% 268 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
153GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 105 105 104 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 137
Write 102
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 104
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
532GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 158 149 144 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 37.2
Write 133
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 151
66% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54%
Great: 107%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
5GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 57.6
Mixed 38.8
37% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00 250GB
181GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 26 29 35 33 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 17
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 30.6
30% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 30.8
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 29.5
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B560 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback