ECS G41T-M7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardECS G41T-M7  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110902
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '22 at 16:53
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$47
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 37.3
29% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 36.1
8-Core 36.4
5% 36.2 Pts
64-Core 37.4
2% 37.4 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Incredible G41 Express Chipset
Elitegroup(1019 2260) 831MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 10.0.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.9
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 87 65 60 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 93.9
Write 87.8
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 76
53% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
0GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 97.7
Write 122
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 121
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41T-M7 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS G41T-M7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $48
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback