Asrock G41M-VS3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock G41M-VS3  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100531
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '21 at 01:26
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5200-$47
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 88.5
47% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 89
8-Core 88.9
12% 88.9 Pts
64-Core 90.2
6% 90.2 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Incredible G41 Express Chipset
ASRock(1849 2E32) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 10.0.0.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.8
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 0.6
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS728080PLAT20 82GB-$65
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA21B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.6 7.4 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.01% Terrible
Read 17.6
Write 9.5
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 10
10% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.01%
Great: 31%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
152GB free
Firmware: AM001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 92.4
Write 93.4
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 95
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41M-VS3 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G41M-VS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback