Huananzhi X79

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	92% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 (all builds)
Memory	18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210423
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '22 at 11:52
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 160 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 533 50% 417 Pts	64-Core 813 50% 813 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 108 Parallax 108 95% 111 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 101 Splatting 91.3 87% 108 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0C-00AJM0 240GB 3,525 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: 231050WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 127 132 132 134 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1,384 Write 973 Mixed 960 SusWrite 162 193% 870 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 54.6 178% 62.6 MB/s	DQ Read 561 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 476 350% 464 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 189%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 157GB free Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 55 67 26 236 224 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 429 Write 169 Mixed 172 SusWrite 127 49% 224 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 13.4 66% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 67.2 DQ Mixed 29 39% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 61%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 339GB free Firmware: 1A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 84 88 90 90 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 116 Write 11.7 Mixed 71 SusWrite 87.2 53% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.4 184% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 79%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 466GB free Firmware: 1507 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 18 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 27.7 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 18.7 20% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 60%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 464GB free Firmware: 1507 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 88 88 89 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 70.8 Write 81.2 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 87.4 54% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 60%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 14GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 11 10 9.6 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 23.7 Write 13.7 Mixed 15 SusWrite 10.3 20% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.8 55% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 465GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 17 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 10 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 16.3 25% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 738 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 36.4 MC Mixed 36.2 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10.5 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	122x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	67x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
AS2280P4 256GBApacerBench 168%, 1,607 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	56x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	46x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16