Huananzhi X79

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 (all builds)
Memory	21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210423
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '22 at 21:02
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 83.2 2-Core 157 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 299 8-Core 530 50% 414 Pts	64-Core 817 51% 817 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.4% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 109 Parallax 112 90% 111 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 102 Splatting 92.2 87% 109 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0C-00AJM0 240GB 3,525 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 231050WD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,395 Write 977 Mixed 956 246% 1,110 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 57.2 191% 67.9 MB/s	DQ Read 575 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 483 356% 473 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 189%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 290GB free Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 232 105 73 242 257 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 427 Write 312 Mixed 253 SusWrite 188 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 17.8 58% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 90.6 DQ Mixed 43.2 49% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 61%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 339GB free Firmware: 1A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 100 103 102 103 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 99.9 Write 89 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 101 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.3 152% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 79%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 466GB free Firmware: 1507 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 19 18 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 29 Mixed 27.9 SusWrite 18.6 20% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 60%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 465GB free Firmware: 1507 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 87 88 88 88 88 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 67.4 Write 77.5 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 86.4 52% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 60%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 466GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 16 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.8% Terrible	Read 29.2 Write 3.2 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 16.3 16% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 12% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.8% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 738 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 36.7 MC Mixed 36.5 109% 38 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	124x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	67x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
AS2280P4 256GBApacerBench 168%, 1,607 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	57x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	46x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16