Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 19:55
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 139
60% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 472
44% 369 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 108
Parallax 112
94% 112 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 101
Splatting 93.5
88% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0C-00AJM0 240GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231050WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1324
Write 996
Mixed 968
243% 1,096 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 44.4
151% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 420
309% 409 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 189%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
443GB free
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 224 194 200 224 225 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 468
Write 342
Mixed 307
SusWrite 213
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 15.9
54% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 93.1
DQ Mixed 42.5
49% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 61%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
301GB free
Firmware: 1A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 93 97 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 72.3
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 97.3
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
161% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 79%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 27.9
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 18.9
20% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 60%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB
273GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 71 71 70 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 64
Write 72
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 69.9
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 60%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
466GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 32
Write 23.7
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 16.6
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 36.6
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback