Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory41.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 03:15
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 848
83% 682 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 241
Reflection 215
Parallax 218
196% 224 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 162
Splatting 133
144% 183 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 163%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 438 436 442 443 448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 460
Mixed 416
SusWrite 436
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 53.7
177% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
107GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 439 454 448 322 255 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 473
Mixed 379
SusWrite 389
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 44.7
153% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 252
216% 319 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145
3TB free
Firmware: SC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 168 170 173 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 160
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 170
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2D3000C16 029E CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2D3000C16 029E CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 48GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 28.3
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 15.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback