Lenovo 82QG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 82% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82QG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220517
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 06:33
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 82%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 58.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 213
67% 125 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 822
72% 610 Pts
64-Core 1,130
70% 1,130 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AE4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1298
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 30.2
18% 27.2 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 22.8
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znt1t02 LS KIOXIA 1TB
708GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0106ANLS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 913 744 893 829 651 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,139
Write 947
Mixed 934
SusWrite 777
213% 949 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 43.7
154% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 690
476% 607 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 166%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
132% Outstanding
MC Read 60
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 49.5
151% 52.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 23.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 132%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82QG Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82QG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback