Lenovo 82QG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 82% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82QG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 22:36
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 82%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 58
1-Core 197
2-Core 390
108% 215 Pts
4-Core 631
8-Core 923
97% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,302
81% 1,302 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AE4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1298
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 25.4
19% 25 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 20.2
19% 23.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znt1t02 LS KIOXIA 1TB
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0106ANLS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 553 812 778 1263 1033 584 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,673
Write 1,419
Mixed 1,156
SusWrite 837
284% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 75.7
249% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,119
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 846
601% 786 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 229%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
134% Outstanding
MC Read 58.4
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 49
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 26.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 134%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82QG Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82QG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback