Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 04:59
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 237
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 627
68% 537 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.1
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84% Excellent
Lighting 88.1
Reflection 133
Parallax 165
72% 129 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 85.3
Splatting 128
108% 134 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 84%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 280 282 291 288 290 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 435
Write 287
Mixed 230
SusWrite 285
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 25.2
111% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 123
127% 210 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 91%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 103 103 105 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 97.8
Mixed 72
SusWrite 103
70% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.M8FB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.7
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $401
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback