Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170209
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 13 '20 at 19:26
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	51.5% Above average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 59.1 2-Core 85 50% 75.1 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 245 22% 183 Pts	64-Core 261 16% 261 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3794) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.3% Very good	Lighting 88.6 Reflection 117 Parallax 107 72% 104 fps	MRender 85.7 Gravity 110 Splatting 92.3 78% 96 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 249 265 258 243 250 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 483 Write 271 Mixed 259 SusWrite 251 70% 316 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 82 4K Mixed 24.9 115% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 216 189% 284 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 355GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 120 124 124 124 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 120 Write 99.5 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 124 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.M8FB 4x4GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	60% Good	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 21.4 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	116x
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	68x
Core i7-7700KIntel $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	36x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	11x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16