MSI Z490-A PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C75
MotherboardMSI Z490-A PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 15:42
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 96.8
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 189
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 704
62% 529 Pts
64-Core 1,000
62% 1,000 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 884F) ≥ 4GB; E2912U-C DUAL-RTX3060TI-O8G-MINI-V2
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 173
Parallax 161
143% 170 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 133
Splatting 118
116% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 365 398 393 405 401 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 441
Mixed 425
SusWrite 382
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 43.3
141% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 275
225% 322 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 121%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
154GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 789 822 821 829 830 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,543
Write 1,723
Mixed 1,330
SusWrite 922
310% 1,379 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 57.3
191% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 411
DQ Mixed 536
395% 524 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 201%
Great: 276%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 217 215 208 217 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 159
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 213
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
233GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 105 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 105
Write 98.8
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 105
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
886GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 112
133% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 26.6
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 39.4
SC Mixed 25.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 51.2
78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z490-A PRO (MS-7C75) Builds (Compare 20,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z490-A PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,017
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback