MSI Z490-A PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C75
MotherboardMSI Z490-A PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 12:33
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 235
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 717
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 1,007
62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 884F) ≥ 4GB; E2912U-C DUAL-RTX3060TI-O8G-MINI-V2
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 172
Parallax 150
143% 166 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 128
Splatting 117
114% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 340 170 140 138 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 484
Write 155
Mixed 413
SusWrite 206
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 40.6
134% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 270
216% 304 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 121%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
154GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1380 808 829 834 836 833 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,521
Write 1064
Mixed 1,445
SusWrite 920
278% 1,237 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 55.7
182% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 492
366% 490 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 196%
Great: 276%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 20 22 29 217 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 198
Write 12.9
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 86.1
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
233GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 17 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 100
Write 17.1
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 16.7
32% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
886GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 102
Write 16.4
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 15.5
45% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 26.5
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 29.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 50.6
79% 50.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z490-A PRO (MS-7C75) Builds (Compare 20,415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z490-A PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,017
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback