MSI B250M PRO-VH (MS-7A74)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A74
MotherboardMSI B250M PRO-VH (MS-7A74)  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 13:00
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4600-$27
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 194
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 281
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7A74) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.53 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.8
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39MNC-3510A 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 50100P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 220 169 162 135 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.7% Good
Read 170
Write 276
Mixed 277
SusWrite 174
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 29.5
120% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 235
197% 287 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
297GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 124 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 127
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 125
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 113%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 51 73 85 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 138
Write 141
Mixed 54
SusWrite 64.6
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
234% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 133 135 138 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 98.3
Write 108
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 134
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
226% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 94%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
402GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 44 41 13 74 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 247
Write 2.5
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 44.4
72% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 59%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 249GB
184GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 91 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 128
Write 88.6
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 91.6
112% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B1GMS.C7W0B 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.5% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 23.3
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250M PRO-VH (MS-7A74) Builds (Compare 806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B250M PRO-VH (MS-7A74)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback